Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ¿¡¼­ °ñ ÀÌ½Ä À¯¹«¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¯¿¬°ñ ¼Ò½Ç¿¡ °üÇÑ ÈÄÇâÀû ¿¬±¸

Retrospective study on marginal bone loss around maxillary anterior implants with or without bone graft

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2016³â 54±Ç 2È£ p.103 ~ 109
ȲÈñ¼±, Á¤ÁöÇý, ±èÀ¯¸®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ȲÈñ¼± ( Hwang Hee-Sun ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¤ÁöÇý ( Jung Ji-Hye ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èÀ¯¸® ( Kim Yu-Lee ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³½Ã °ñ ÀÌ½Ä À¯¹«¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ º¯¿¬°ñ ¼Ò½Ç·®À» ÃøÁ¤, ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³°ú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â °ñ À̽ÄÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÇÀǸ¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 2011³â 6¿ùºÎÅÍ 2014³â 5¿ù »çÀÌ¿¡ ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¼¾ÅÍ¿¡¼­ »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ¿¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ°í º¸Ã¶Ä¡·á¸¦ ÁøÇàÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Áø·á±â·ÏºÎ¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ ½Ã±â, °íÁ¤Ã¼ÀÇ Á÷°æ ¹× ±æÀÌ, Áö´ëÁÖ ¿¬°á¹æ¹ý, °ñÀÌ½Ä À¯¹«¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ Á÷ÈÄ¿Í °¡Àå ÃÖ±Ù ³»¿ø ½ÃÀÇ Ä¡±Ù´Ü ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Emago advanced v5.6 (Oral diagnostic systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands) ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¯¿¬°ñ ¼Ò½Ç·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °ñ ÀÌ½Ä À¯¹«°¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖÀ§ º¯¿¬°ñ ¼Ò½Ç¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿© Window¿ë SPSS ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µ¶¸³Ç¥º» t °ËÁ¤À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ȯÀÚ 52¸í¿¡¼­ 83°³ ÀÓÇöõÆ®(°ñ ÀÌ½Ä ¾øÀÌ ½Ä¸³µÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ® 44°³, °ñ À̽İú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ½Ä¸³µÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ® 39°³)¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 6 - 45°³¿ù(Æò±Õ 18.4°³¿ù)µ¿¾È °üÂûÇÑ °á°ú °ñ ÀÌ½Ä ¾øÀÌ ½Ä¸³µÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ®´Â 1.42 ¡¾ 0.42 mm, °ñ À̽İú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ½Ä¸³µÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ®´Â 1.28 ¡¾ 0.45 mmÀÇ º¯¿¬°ñ ¼Ò½ÇÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÇÑ°è ³»¿¡¼­, °ñ À̽İú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ½Ä¸³µÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ º¯¿¬°ñ ¼Ò½Ç·®ÀÌ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Àû¾ú´Ù.

PURPOSE: This study is to evaluate the clinical significance of implantation with simultaneous bone graft by comparing the marginal bone loss around maxillary anterior implants with or without bone graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with implant-retained restorations on maxillary anterior region at Implant Center, Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University between June 2011 and May 2014 were included in this study. Date of implant placement, implant diameter, implant length, implant-abutment connection type and whether the bone graft was done were investigated. The patient¡¯s periapical radiographs taken immediately after implantation and at the most recent visit were compared. Marginal bone loss was measured using Emago advanced v5.6 program (Oral diagnostic systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Statistical analysis was done in independent t-test by using SPSS 22.0 program.

RESULTS: As a result of observing on 83 implants (without bone graft: 44, with bone graft: 39) of 52 patients for 6 - 45 months (average: 18.4 months), implants without bone graft showed 1.42 ¡¾ 0.42 mm, implants with bone graft showed 1.28 ¡¾ 0.45 mm of marginal bone loss.

CONCLUSION: In limitations of this study, implants with simultaneous bone graft had significantly less marginal bone loss than implants without bone graft.

Å°¿öµå

Ä¡°ú ÀÓÇöõÆ®; »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ; °ñÀ̽Ä; º¯¿¬°ñ ¼Ò½Ç; µðÁöÅÐ °øÁ¦¼ú
Dental implant; Anterior maxilla; Bone graft; Marginal bone loss; Digital subtraction radiography

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed